My Name Is Norman Bates…

Published February 1, 2011 by Jennifer Loring

Norman Bates has become a pop culture icon. Songs have even been written about him. Thus it is with a sense of shame that I admit, after 25 years of reading horror novels, this is the first time I’ve read Psycho. (I have, however, seen the film as well as its unfortunate remake.) My only other exposure to Robert Bloch up to this point had been Lori, a forgettable book at best. Psycho, on the other hand, offers up a thoroughly engaging, fast-paced story that is a deserved classic.

An aspect of Bloch’s novel that I found most intriguing was his female characters. In 1959 women in books, film and television were typically portrayed as submissive and timid, always waiting for the men in their lives to take decisive action for them. In Psycho, Bloch reverses the roles. He begins with Mary, who is tired of waiting for her fiance, Sam, to pay off his debts and marry her. Mary literally snatches the opportunity to change her fortunes when her employer gives her $40,000 to deposit in the bank; her theft of the money sets the novel’s plot in motion. While Sam and the sheriff are content to sit and wait to hear from the company’s private investigator, Arbogast, Mary’s sister Lila demands an investigation. It is Lila who decides to explore the Bates house by herself and find evidence of the crimes she knows have been committed, when no one else seems to care what has happened to Mary. Rather than punishing her character for being “emotional,” an epithet applied to women for centuries, Bloch makes it clear that, were it not for Lila’s emotions pushing her forward, the case would have likely never been solved. The bloody earring that Lila finds in the motel shower, a discovery driven by frustration and her refusal to give up when everyone else appears to have done so, leads her into the house and eventually the dreaded fruit cellar. To Bloch, emotions are something that all human beings ought to express, especially in a crisis, and Lila is rightfully troubled by Sam’s response to his fiancee’s disappearance.

Of course, even emotions can become a destructive force when not properly channeled, and so has Norman Bates’ codependent love for his mother destroyed his very sanity. At one point Bloch mentions that Norman believes he has symptoms of schizophrenia, though the true culprit reveals itself to be dissociative identity disorder (as noted in the DSM-IV-TR; elsewhere it is still known as multiple personality disorder). Both disorders are rare and not well-understood, even less so when Bloch was writing his novel, and DID has often been wrongly identified as schizophrenia. Despite this, Bloch does an excellent job portraying the symptoms of severe DID, the development of which fits perfectly with Norman’s past trauma. Norman’s “conversations” with his dead mother are frightening, but it is the final scene of the book in which the horror of Norman’s DID fully reveals itself. Having always been dominated by his mother, Norman allows her a twisted form of justice for his murder of her, his one last act of love–his personality “dies,” leaving Mother in its place and in his body. Not since reading Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian has a novel’s ending disturbed me in such a way.

Robert Bloch delivered everything I enjoy in a horror novel. We have a strong female character, a vastly disturbed antagonist, and a chilling plot trimmed of all unnecessary ornamentation. As a writer there is so much I can take away from Bloch’s book: the deceptive simplicity of his prose, his talent for characterization, his gift for building suspense. Not to mention an ending that will stick with me forever.

7 comments on “My Name Is Norman Bates…

  • Great post, Jenn. I liked Bloch's female characters. I hadn't even thought about the role of emotions in this one. A side note that plays into a comment you made: I heard once that the word "hysterical" is etymologically linked to "hysterectomy", suggesting through language that panic is the realm of women. Bloch's not so square. I haven't read BLOOD MERIDIAN yet, but McCarthy is one of my favorites. Have you read ALL THE PRETTY HORSES?

    Like

  • Thanks! I've spent the past couple of weeks on painkillers while recovering from two oral surgeries, so I was hoping this post managed to be coherent. 🙂 I read something similar about the etymology of "hysteria," so Bloch's treatment of his female characters, given the era in which he was writing, was quite impressive to me.I haven't read All the Pretty Horses Yet, but I too love McCarthy's work. Definitely read Blood Meridian when you get a chance; the last lines of that book are absolutely chilling.

    Like

  • Jenn, I thought you made a great point about Bloch's reversal of 50's men and women stereotypical roles, emotionally speaking. Even though I thought that Norman's mother was utterly controlling, I failed to place Mary and Lila in the time frame of "Psycho"'s publication. Great post and thanks for getting me thinking about how the truth might have never been found if not for Lila's "get-up-and-go" attitude. Or even happened if not for Mary's going a little "crazy" in the first place.

    Like

  • Okay. If this post shows up about ten times, sorry. I don't know what's going on with my computer, but it is eating my posts.Anyway..I think your idea about the role of female characters is fantastic. It seems so obvious, but I didn't even think about it. Not only is it true of Mary and Lila, but of Norman's mother as well.Great post!slhb

    Like

  • Jenn, your insight that Bloch gives us very strong female characters in an era in which women weren't perceived as being strong (or equal, or independent, blah, blah, blah) is fantastic and you back it up very well. I thought the female characters were all rather insipid compared to Bates, as I opined in my own post on this novel, but now I'm rethinking my original opinion.

    Like

  • Bloch was on the cutting edge with his female characters. If I recall correctly, he said, in an interview, that weak women just weren't interesting to him, and that's why he tried to make his female characters strong. Food for thought. Good post!

    Like

  • Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

    WordPress.com Logo

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

    Connecting to %s

    %d bloggers like this: